Cases 11 - 20 of 29
McDonald v. AbbVie Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00824
Plaintiff:
Ronald McDonald
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc., Abbott Laboratories, AbbVie Products LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-55942
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Laurence Stewart v. Leroy Kirkegard, et al
as 17-35493
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAURENCE STEWART
Defendant - Appellee:
LEROY KIRKEGARD, MIKE BATISTA, LORAINE WODNIK and others
JONES v. SAINT MARY'S HOSPITAL et al
as 3:2017cv00060
Plaintiff:
LOVELL JAVHON JONES
Defendant:
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE and SAINT MARY'S HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Stewart v. Kirkegard et al
as 6:2015cv00084
Plaintiff:
Laurence Stewart
Defendant:
Leroy Kirkegard, Mike Batista, Loraine Wodnik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prudential Insurance Company of America et al v. Manuele et al
as 2:2015cv00688
Defendant:
ALCAC/St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Inc., Ben Bishop, Paul Bishop and others
Plaintiff:
Pruco Life Insurance Company and Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
PARKER v. MCDONALD et al
as 2:2015cv01910
Plaintiff:
ZOE VICTORIA PARKER
Defendant:
RONALD MCDONALD and VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CTR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Lanham v. Kirkegard et al
as 6:2015cv00009
Plaintiff:
Thomas Creel Lanham
Respondent:
Leroy Kirkegard
Defendant:
Sam Jovanovich, Ronald McDonald and Dave Pentland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronald McDonald House of Amarillo v. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
as 2:2014cv00180
Plaintiff:
Ronald McDonald House of Amarillo
Defendant:
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McDonald v. Butts et al
as 1:2014cv01393
Defendant:
Seamore Dirty Butts, Jr. and Idalgo J Montoya
Plaintiff:
Ronald McDonald
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
