Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv06568
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00984
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Nykoriak v. Thomas et al
as 2:2017cv11202
Plaintiff:
Taras P Nykoriak
Defendant:
Ronald Thomas and City of Detroit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas et al v. Lincoln County, et al
as 6:2016cv00562
Defendant:
Giovanni Barbers, Page Beutler, Josh Bighill and others
Plaintiff:
Catherine Thomas and Ronald Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv04380
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
York College Legal And Compliance/EOC Officer/Sexual/Harassment Officer:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Officials And Business Agent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
York College Vice President And Responsible For Tyrone Forte:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv05043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Aspinall v. Thomas et al
as 3:2015cv00699
Plaintiff:
Michael E Aspinall
Defendant:
Ronald Thomas , Jason Thomas , John Masco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frederick Ronald Thomas Jr et al v. City of Fullerton et al
as 8:2012cv01275
Defendant:
James Blatney, James Blatney, Jay Patrick Cicinelli and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Ronald Thomas Jr and Frederick Ronald Thomas Jr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
