Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 38
Williams v. Hall et al
as 2:2018cv02008
Plaintiff: Rufus Williams
Defendant: . Withers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rufus Williams v. Duncan MacLaren
as 15-2511
Petitioner - Appellant: RUFUS WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee: DUNCAN MACLAREN
PINSON v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2015cv01833
Petitioner: Jeremy Pinson
Respondent: HARLEY LAPPIN, Joyce K. Conley, Raymond E. Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Hoffner We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv11435
Petitioner: Rufus Williams
Respondent: Bonita Hoffner
Rufus Williams v. E. Valenzuela
as 2:2014cv06117
Respondent: E. Valenzuela
Petitioner: Rufus Williams
Leigh v. John Doe #1 et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv01223
Plaintiff: John S. Leigh
Defendant: John Doe #1, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Harley G Lappin and others
Miscellaneou: staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SAMPSON et al v. CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS et al
as 1:2013cv24312
Plaintiff: EARL SAMPSON , TOREE M DANIELS , ANTHONY LOWERY and others
Defendant: CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS , OLIVER G GILBERT, III , SHIRLEY GIBSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TERRELL-BEY v. UNITED STATES BOARD OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2013cv01484
Petitioner: BROOKS JAMES TERRELL-BEY
Respondent: UNITED STATES BOARD OF PRISONS, Constance Reese, Rufus Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. USA - 2255 We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv02291
Petitioner: Rufus William Mason
Respondent: USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
TERRELL-BEY v. UNITED STATES BOARD OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2013cv00747
Plaintiff: BROOKS JAMES TERRELL-BEY
Defendant: UNITED STATES BOARD OF PRISONS, CONSTANCE REESE, RUFUS WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?