Cases 31 - 40 of 91
Liviz v. Supreme Court of the United States of America et al
as 1:2018cv12532
Plaintiff:
Ilya Liviz
Defendant:
Neil M. Gorsuch, Brett M. Kavanaugh, John G. Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ou-Young v. Roberts et al
as 5:2018ct03272
Defendant:
Maxine M. Chesney, J.C. Holland, Joseph S. Zonno and others
Plaintiff:
Kuang Bao Ou-Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SHAO v. KENNEDY et al
as 1:2018cv01233
Plaintiff:
YI TAI SHAO
Defendant:
JOHN G. ROBERTS, ANTHONY M. KENNEDY, CLARENCE THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arunachalam v. Davila et al
as 3:2018cv02488
Plaintiff:
Lakshmi Arunachalam
Defendant:
Edward J. Davila, Elizabeth D. Laporte, Eric M. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HEARD v. ROBERTS et al
as 1:2018cv00851
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HEARD
Defendant:
JOHN ROBERTS, ANTHONY KENNEDY, CLARENCE THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
CARBAJAL v. ROBERTS et al
as 1:2018cv00523
Plaintiff:
DEAN CARBAJAL
Defendant:
JOHN G. ROBERTS, JR., SONIA SOTOMAYOR, ANTHONY M. KENNEDY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
R. Johnson v. John Roberts, et al
as 17-5200
Plaintiff - Appellant:
R. Wayne Johnson
Defendant - Appellee:
John Roberts, Chief Judge, C. Thomas, Kennedy, Justice and others
JOHNSON v. ROBERTS et al
as 1:2017cv00777
Plaintiff:
R. WAYNE JOHNSON
Defendant:
JOHN ROBERTS, C. THOMAS, KENNEDY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sara Hassman v. Mark Hassman, et al
as 17-55533
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SARA HASSMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK F. HASSMAN, SEASTROM, SEASTROM AND TUTTLE, entity no. C0995775 (formally Seastrom and Seastrom), CLAUDIA SILBAR, Judge, Superior Court of California, County of Orange, Dept. C63 and others
Sara Hassman v. Mark F. Hassman et al
as 2:2017cv01081
Defendant:
Marshall R. Cole, Cummings, McClorey, Davis, Acho and Associates P.C., Does and others
Plaintiff:
Sara Hassman
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
