Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Carroll et al v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co
as 2:2022cv00356
Plaintiff:
George Carroll and Ruth Carroll
Defendant:
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Carroll et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02511
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ruth Carroll and John Carroll
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carroll v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv13791
Plaintiff:
Ruth Carroll
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gutierrez et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv30461
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. , American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc. , Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
San Juana Gutierrez , Mary E. Bayless , Angelina M. Laningham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gutierrez et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00358
Plaintiff:
San Juana Gutierrez, Mary E. Bayless, Angelina M. Laningham and others
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc., American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
CARROLL et al v. CVS PHARMACY #2583 et al
as 2:2013cv00582
Plaintiff:
JAMES CARROLL and RUTH CARROLL
Defendant:
CVS PHARMACY #2583, PENNSYLVANIA CVS PHARMACY, LLC , CVS PHARMACY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv03484
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Miscellaneou:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Carroll, v. AMEX Assurance Company
as 5:2007cv00127
Plaintiff:
Ruth Carroll and Ruth Carroll
Defendant:
AMEX Assurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
