Cases 1 - 10 of 106
Ragin v. Lockwood et al
as 1:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
Errie Ragin
Defendant:
Shekina Lockwood and NC Department of Adult Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv02565
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Ferrer v. Deandre et al
as 1:2023cv24699
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Ferrer
Defendant:
Daniels Deandre, Ragin Rye, Harvey Ruvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv05903
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
John Ragin v. Chadwick Dotson
as 23-6955
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN RAGIN
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of Department of Corrections, JEFFERY ARTRIP, Warden and CHADWICK DOTSON
RAGINS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv18988
Plaintiff:
MIRANDA RAGINS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Brown v. Richland County et al
as 8:2023cv02201
Plaintiff:
Kamron Gibson Brown
Defendant:
Richland County, Crystal Ragin, Kevin McCullough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
RAGIN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv07523
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RAGIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00579
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
