Cases 1 - 10 of 15
v. Sky Premier Parts, LLC et al
as 2:2025at00964
Defendant:
Shine Logistics, LLC, NS FREIGHT, INC. and RAHUL GUPTA
Claimant:
Sky Premier Parts, LLC and Sonny & Bosco, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act
Sonny & Bosco Parts, LLC et al v Shine Logistics, et al.,
as 2:2025cv02075
Plaintiff:
Sky Premier Parts, LLC and Sonny & Bosco, Inc.
Defendant:
Shine Logistics, LLC, NS Freight, Inc. and Rahul Gupta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act
Li v. Peck
as 25-1356
Plaintiff:
DONGMEI LI, -
Defendant:
RICHARD PECK, AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE INC, MACKENZIE D'LORIO and others
Gupta v. Weber et al
as 1:2025cv00432
Petitioner:
Rahul Gupta
Respondent:
Ronald S. Weber and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Li v. Peck
as 24-1659
Plaintiff:
DONGMEI LI
Defendant:
RICHARD PECK, AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE INC, MACKENZIE D'LORIO and others
Li v. Connecticut
as 22-2863
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dongmei Li
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Connecticut, Dept of Public Health, Connecticut, Dept of Mental Health & Addiction Svcs, Connecticut and others
Li v. State of Connecticut
as 22-1980
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dongmei Li
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Connecticut, Dept of Public Health, Connecticut, Dept of Mental Health & Addiction Svcs, Connecticut and others
Li v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2021cv00996
Plaintiff:
Dongmei Li
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Dept of Public Health, Dept of Mental Health & Addiction Svcs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schoenhoff v. Cardtronics plc et al
as 1:2021cv02282
Defendant:
Rahul Gupta, G. Patrick Phillips, Mark Rossi and others
Plaintiff:
Paula Schoenhoff
Lhamon v. Cardtronics PLC et al
as 1:2021cv03448
Defendant:
Rahul Gupta, Patrick Phillips, Mark Rossi and others
Plaintiff:
Chris Lhamon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sv
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
