Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Li v. Connecticut
as 22-2863
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dongmei Li
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Connecticut, Dept of Public Health, Connecticut, Dept of Mental Health & Addiction Svcs, Connecticut and others
Li v. State of Connecticut
as 22-1980
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dongmei Li
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Connecticut, Dept of Public Health, Connecticut, Dept of Mental Health & Addiction Svcs, Connecticut and others
Li v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2021cv00996
Plaintiff:
Dongmei Li
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Dept of Public Health, Dept of Mental Health & Addiction Svcs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schoenhoff v. Cardtronics plc et al
as 1:2021cv02282
Defendant:
Rahul Gupta, G. Patrick Phillips, Mark Rossi and others
Plaintiff:
Paula Schoenhoff
Lhamon v. Cardtronics PLC et al
as 1:2021cv03448
Defendant:
Rahul Gupta, Patrick Phillips, Mark Rossi and others
Plaintiff:
Chris Lhamon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sv
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03750
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Dreyfuse v. Gupta et al
as 2:2018cv01152
Defendant:
Rahul Gupta and Allen Mock
Plaintiff:
Edward Jesse Dreyfuse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Persaud v. Gupta
as 1:2017cv01273
Defendant:
Rahul Gupta
Plaintiff:
Narad Persaud
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CENGAGE LEARNING, INC. et al v. APPALACIAN INC. et al
as 2:2017cv01009
Plaintiff:
CENGAGE LEARNING, INC. and PEARSON EDUCATION, INC.
Defendant:
APPALACIAN INC. , RK GROUP ASSOCIATES LLC , RAHUL GUPTA and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Nationwide Property & Casualty Insurance Company v. Gupta et al
as 1:2016cv01530
Plaintiff:
Nationwide Property & Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Rahul Gupta , William T. Waugh , Nancy M. Waugh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
