Cases 11 - 20 of 415
Eric Drake v. FedEx Corporation, et al
as 24-5217
Plaintiff:
ERIC DRAKE
Defendant:
FEDEX CORPORATION, FEDEX CORPORATE SERVICES, INC., FREDRICK W. SMITH and others
Kedin Garcia-Mendez, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 24-3189
Petitioner:
KEDIN EDUARDO GARCIA-MENDEZ, LILIAN KARINA RIVERA-RAMIREZ and JOSE EDUARDO GARCIA-RIVERA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Flakes v. Reed et al
as 2:2024cv10475
Plaintiff:
Jason Flakes
Defendant:
Reed, D. Horvath, J Bugbee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flakes #407798 v. Reed et al
as 1:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Jason Flakes #407798
Defendant:
Unknown Reed, D. Horvath, J. Bugbee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Silva Ramirez v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00525
Plaintiff:
Arcelia Silva Ramirez
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thornsberry et al v. Clark et al
as 3:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Thornsberry and Kelli Hendricks
Defendant:
Dwayne Clark, Steve Durham, Eric Troutman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown-Perry et al v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Rekiesha Brown-Perry and Justin Brown
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., CoreCivic of Tennessee, Damon T. Hininger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Rene Gomez
as 24-5030
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RENE RAMIREZ GOMEZ
McCarren et al v. Washington et al
as 2:2023cv13129
Plaintiff:
Michael David McCarren, Maurice Stewart, Levertis Riley and others
Defendant:
Raphael Washington, Robert Dunlap, Boyer and others
Ramirez v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv04007
Plaintiff:
Violet Ramirez
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
