Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Trantham v. Ballard et al
as 3:2023cv00075
Petitioner:
Randall Steven Trantham
Respondent:
Ben Ballard and Jeff Landry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stevens v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2022cv05862
Plaintiff:
Randall Stevens
Defendant:
Pierce County, Colby Edwards, Greggory Marty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STEVENS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv18869
Plaintiff:
RANDAL STEVENS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SPEARS v. DRIGGERS et al
as 1:2022cv00035
Plaintiff:
RANDALL STEVEN SPEARS
Defendant:
DRIGGERS, J HILL and J HILL M JOHNSTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ryan-Smith v. Green et al
as 3:2021cv01064
Plaintiff:
Patricia Margaret Ryan-Smith
Defendant:
Randall Steven Green and ADT Service Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernandez et al v. Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit District (SMART)
as 4:2021cv01782
Plaintiff:
Michael Caldwell, Phyllis Accornero, Paul Naepflin and others
Defendant:
Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit District (SMART)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STEVENS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv09710
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RANDAL STEVENS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Amy et al v. Curtis
as 4:2019cv02184
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE, MYA, VIOLET and others
Defendant:
Randall Steven Curtis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stockton v. Eli Lilly & Company
as 3:2019cv02053
Plaintiff:
Randall Steven Stockton
Defendant:
Eli Lilly & Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Day et al v. Abbott Laboratories et al
as 2:2018cv08550
Plaintiff:
Mary Day , LISA GARCIA , Michelle Culbertson and others
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
