Cases 11 - 20 of 67
Travelers Commerical Insurance Company v. Vintage Tub & Bath et al
as 1:2018cv01029
Defendant:
Chris Rogers, Vintage Tub & Bath, Randolph Morris Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
Travelers Commerical Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Randolph v. Prime Inc
as 3:2017cv00451
Plaintiff:
Brezault Randolph
Defendant:
Prime Inc
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Coffey v. CNR Holdings LLC et al
as 3:2016cv00222
Plaintiff:
Leslie D Coffey
Defendant:
CNR Holdings LLC, William Hank Randolph and Trent C Gaines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Randolph v. Kraft Heinz Foods Company
as 1:2016cv06168
Plaintiff:
Melissa Leigh Randolph
Defendant:
Kraft Heinz Foods Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Byrd v. Lewis
as 2:2016cv00454
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Lee Byrd
Defendant:
Neal Randolph Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Randolph v. Kraft Heinz Foods Company
as 9:2016cv80511
Plaintiff:
Melissa Leigh Randolph
Defendant:
Kraft Heinz Foods Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROBERTS et al v. MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLC
as 2:2016cv01063
Plaintiff:
ADRIAN CLIVE ROBERTS , GINA McVEY , JOHN LINGUA and others
Defendant:
MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Frank Howell, Sr. v. Springleaf Financial Services, et al
as 15-15767
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANK HOWELL, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
SPRINGLEAF FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. and BEVERLY RANDOLPH
Howell v. Springleaf Financial Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv03646
Plaintiff:
Frank A. Howell, Sr.
Defendant:
Springleaf Financial Services, Inc. and Beverly Randolph
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Formo et al v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 0:2015cv02292
Plaintiff:
John H. Formo , Timothy J. Cuypers , Cuypers Farms and others
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
