Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Randy Jefferson v. Harold Clarke
as 16-7737
Petitioner - Appellant:
RANDY WARREN JEFFERSON
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE
Lane v. Lacortiglia
as 3:2016cv03416
Plaintiff:
Randy Warren Lane, II
Defendant:
Jeffrey Lacortiglia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sweeney et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv05044
Plaintiff:
Linda Sweeney and Randy Warren
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jefferson v. Clarke
as 2:2015cv00450
Petitioner:
Randy Warren Jefferson
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Randy Warren v. Mtge Elec Reg Sys, Inc., et al
as 14-11102
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDY WARREN
Defendant - Appellee:
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED, as nominee for American Brokers Conduit and AMERICAN BROKERS CONDUIT
Randy Warren v. Bank of America National Assn
as 14-10540
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDY WARREN
Defendant - Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, As Successory By Merger To BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P., formerly known as Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, L.P.
Warren v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv04185
Plaintiff:
Randy Warren
Defendant:
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems and American Brokers Conduit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Randy Warren v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 13-10353
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDY WARREN
Defendant - Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., as Successor by Merger to B.A.C. Home Loans Servicing L.P., formerly known as Countrywide Home Loan Servicing, L.P.
Warren v. Bank of America NA
as 3:2013cv01135
Defendant:
Bank of America NA
Plaintiff:
Randy Warren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Warren v. Bank of America NA
as 3:2011cv03603
Plaintiff:
Randy Warren
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition to Quiet Title
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
