Cases 1 - 10 of 91
USA v. Ramirez-Benavidez
as 26-10539
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Raul Ramirez-Benavidez
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00981
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Pretrial Detainee)
Ramirez et al v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company, SI
as 1:2026cv01977
Plaintiff:
Raul Ramirez and Felecia Montoya
Defendant:
American Family Mutual Insurance Company, SI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00270
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00826
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00298
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00052
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Pretrial Detainee)
USA v. Ramirez-Benavides
as 24-11017
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Raul Ramirez-Benavides
USA v. Ramirez-Benavidez
as 24-11014
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Raul Ramirez-Benavidez
Geon Hwang et al v. Chiquita Canyon, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv05715
Plaintiff:
JORGE ERNESTO CALVILLO, JUAN GABRIEL GONZALEZ ESCOBAR, JENNAFER JANISSA FEINSTEIN and others
Defendant:
Chiquita Canyon, LLC, Waste Connections Management Services, Inc., Waste Connections US, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
