Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00693
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seay v. UAW Region 8 et al
as 5:2012cv00694
Plaintiff:
Christopher Rhone Seay
Defendant:
UAW Region 8, Gary Casteel, Ray Curry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. Allen
as 7:2011cv03705
Plaintiff:
Clementa Ray Curry
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Defendant:
Brian Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. Scott County Jail et al
as 4:2011cv00275
Plaintiff:
Ronald Ray Curry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. Scott County et al
as 4:2011cv00238
Plaintiff:
Ronald Ray Curry
Defendant:
Scott County, Scott County Sheriff's Department and Scott County Jail Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norman Ray Curry, et al. v. A.c. And S. Inc. (armstrong Cont, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-83923
Plaintiff:
Norman Ray Curry
Defendant:
A.c. And S. Inc. (armstrong Cont
CURRY et al v. A.C. AND S. INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY) et al
as 2:2009cv83923
Plaintiff:
ESTHEL LEE CURRY, ESTHEL LEE CURRY, NORMAN RAY CURRY and others
Defendant:
A.C. AND S. INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY), A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Curry v. Fischer
as 0:2009cv02104
Petitioner:
Bobby Ray Curry, Jr.
Respondent:
Scott P. Fischer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Type:
Other Statutes
Curry v. Fondren
as 0:2008cv00134
Petitioner:
Bobby Ray Curry, Jr.
Respondent:
Dwight Fondren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CURRY v. GONZALES et al
as 1:2007cv00199
Plaintiff:
BOBBY RAY CURRY, JR.
Defendant:
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, HARLEY LAPPIN and FRANCIS J. HARVEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
