Cases 1 - 10 of 81
King v. USA
as 3:2024cv00663
Petitioner:
Mitchell Ray King, Jr
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
KING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv11087
Plaintiff:
PHILIP RAY KING
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
King v. USA
as 3:2023cv01381
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Ray King, Jr
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
DODSON v. KING et al
as 3:2023cv03344
Defendant:
RAY KING, EVA L. KING, ANGELA WHITE DALTON and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN DODSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
King v. Paris Police Department
as 4:2023cv00039
Plaintiff:
Kerry Ray King
Defendant:
Paris Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. et al
as 2:2022cv01834
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RAY KING
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC, PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KING v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv12477
Plaintiff:
DAVID RAY KING
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
King v. International Paper Company
as 2:2022cv00098
Plaintiff:
El-Ray King
Defendant:
International Paper Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615 Family and Medical Leave
King et al v. Oklahoma Department of Human Services et al
as 5:2022cv00194
Plaintiff:
Cody Ray King and Kelsie King
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Human Services, Sara Ward, Machelle Zimmerman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KING v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. et al
as 2:2021cv01810
Plaintiff:
RAY KING
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC, PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
