Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Hill v. Naphcare Inc et al
as 4:2026cv04184
Plaintiff:
Alfonzo D Hill
Defendant:
Naphcare Inc, Jim McLane, Bradford T McLane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daigle v. Advancial Federal Credit Union et al
as 6:2025cv01378
Plaintiff:
Renee Frances Daigle
Defendant:
Advancial Federal Credit Union, Brent Sheffield, Andy Tomalin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Matthews v. Moore et al
as 1:2025cv00121
Plaintiff:
Jerry Ray Matthews
Defendant:
Jesse Moore, Curtis Buckles, Jared Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Non-Prisoner
Matthews v. Gardner et al
as 1:2025cv00088
Plaintiff:
Jerry Ray Matthews
Defendant:
Brian Gardner, Samuel Olson, Austin Schmidt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Non-Prisoner
Hill v. City of Peoria et al
as 1:2025cv01063
Plaintiff:
Alfonzo D Hill
Defendant:
City of Peoria, Christina Chavez, Megan Houghton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Matthews v. Alaska State Troopers et al
as 4:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Kenny Rae Matthews, Jr and Kenny Ray Matthews, Jr.
Defendant:
Alaska State Troopers and Department of Public Safety
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthews v. Beuter et al
as 1:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Jerry Ray Matthews
Defendant:
Dave Beuter, Michelle Reese, Jerry A Vander Sanden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Non-Prisoner
Mathews v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2021cv01686
Petitioner:
Jimmy Ray Mathews and Jimmy Ray Matthews
Respondent:
TDCJ-CID and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Matthews v. Johnson
as 3:2020cv03029
Petitioner:
Jerry Ray Matthews
Respondent:
Robert Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Matthews v. Iowa Department of Corrections
as 3:2020cv03025
Petitioner:
Jerry Ray Matthews
Respondent:
Iowa Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
