Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Mack v. Martinez et al
as 3:2019cv02166
Defendant:
Bryaton + Ducell, Ray Thornton, Stacey L. Montgomery and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Mack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Michael Ray Thornton v. USA
as 7:2011cv80377
Petitioner:
Michael Ray Thornton
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Chilton et al v. Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv03707
Plaintiff:
Belinda Salande Chilton , James S. Sakobie , James Salande and others
Defendant:
Gulf Stream Coach, Inc., North American Catastrophe Services, Inc. and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
THORNTON v. A.C. AND S., INC.
as 2:2010cv64481
Plaintiff:
CHARLES RAY THORNTON
Defendant:
A.C. AND S., INC., A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US v. Michael Thornton
as 10-4161
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL RAY THORNTON
Thornton v. Astrue
as 2:2009cv00461
Petitioner:
Johnny Ray Thornton
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
US v. Michael Thornton
as 09-4364
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL RAY THORNTON
Thornton v. American Standard, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv09389
Plaintiff:
Billy Ray Thornton
Defendant:
American Standard, Inc., The Budd Company, Garlock, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
US v. Michael Thornton
as 08-4251
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL RAY THORNTON
THORNTON v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv66422
Plaintiff:
CHARLES RAY THORNTON
Defendant:
AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC., AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION, CERTAIN TEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
