Cases 1 - 10 of 31,551
Glynndeavin Von Fox v. Sergeant Raymond Odell et al
as 2:2024cv03590
Plaintiff:
Glynndeavin Von Fox
Defendant:
Sergeant Raymond Odell and Police Officer Neil Sneath
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RIVAZ v. MCNEIL et al
as 5:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
JARREL DANIEL RIVAZ
Defendant:
RAYMOND MCNEIL, JOSEPH HUTCHISON and KRISTIAN SHAW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barkley and Associates, Inc. v. Raymond Zakhari et al
as 2:2024cv03645
Plaintiff:
Barkley and Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
Raymond Zakhari, Zeyad Asayed, Ayman Asayed and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
(PC) Mack v. Schwarzneggar et al
as 2:2024cv01221
Plaintiff:
Anthony E. Mack
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzneggar, Edmund G. Brown, Gavin Newsom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trice v. Unknown et al
as 1:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Raymond J. Trice
Defendant:
Unknown, Chad Nixon, Matt Greer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
De Botton v. Quality Loan Service Corporation of Washington, et al.
as 24-2738
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND DE BOTTON
Defendant:
QUALITY LOAN SERVICE CORPORATION OF WASHINGTON, MCCARTHY & HOLTHUS, LLP, WARREN LANCE and others
Crawford v. Smith
as 1:2024cv03447
Plaintiff:
Kristyn Crawford
Defendant:
Raymond Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Peerless Insurance Co. et al v. Barbanell et al
as 3:2024cv00759
Defendant:
El Rancho De Vida, One LLC, El Rancho De Vida, Three LLC, El Rancho de Vida, Four LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Peerless Insurance Co. and Golden Eagle Insurance Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ij Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
SAMS v. PRETORIOUS
as 2:2024cv00160
Petitioner:
RAYMOND D. SAMS
Respondent:
TRICIA PRETORIOUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
