Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 69
USA v. Lewis
as 0:2018mj00695
Defendant: Miles Denzel Raymond Lewis
Plaintiff: USA
USA v. Lewis
as 0:2018mj00695
Defendant: Miles Denzel Raymond Lewis
Plaintiff: USA
Brandon v. Laney
as 6:2018cv00432
Petitioner: Raymond Lewis Brandon
Respondent: Garrett Laney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Hanson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2018cv00012
Plaintiff: Raymond Lewis
Defendant: Jason Hanson, Joseph Sharpe, Scott Mere and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re Chrysler-Dodge-Jeep EcoDiesel Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation
as 3:2017md02777
Defendant: Chrysler-Dodge-Jeep EcoDiesel Marketing, Sales practices and products Liability Litigation, VM Motori S.p.A., Melvin McConnell and others
Plaintiff: Martha Maroon, Craig McCully, Ron Norman and others
Interested Party: The People of the State of California
Petitioner: Michael E Heygood
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Ray v. Treece et al
as 4:2016cv03292
Plaintiff: Lewis Micheal Ray
Defendant: Gerald Thomas Treece, Lillie A. Brown, Michael Attorney at Law Treece and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ray v. Treece et al
as 1:2016cv01194
Defendant: Lillie A. Brown, Raymond Lewis, Jr., Clauda Treece and others
Plaintiff: Lewis Micheal Ray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Hanson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2016cv00804
Plaintiff: Raymond Lewis
Defendant: J. Hanson, J. Sharpe, S. Mere and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis et al v. 3M Company et al
as MN/0:16-cv-02193
Defendant: 3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Plaintiff: Raymond Lewis and Tonjia Lewis
Perry v. USA
as 2:2016cv00302
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Raymond Lewis Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?