Cases 1 - 10 of 16
MURPHY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2023cv03804
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND MURPHY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Axos Bank v. Murphy
as 7:2023cv00669
Plaintiff:
AXOS BANK f/k/a BOFI FEDERAL BANK, Axos Bank and BOFI Federal Bank
Defendant:
RAYMOND MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fc Diversity - Foreclosure
Murphy v. Leu
as 2:2022cv00110
Petitioner:
Andrew Raymond Murphy
Respondent:
David Leu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
MURPHY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv67948
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND MURPHY
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murphy v. USA
as 2:2020cv00014
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Andrew Raymond Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
MURPHY v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2019cv02747
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND MURPHY
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL LLC, COOK INCORPORATED and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company II v. Murphy-Rosado et al
as 3:2015cv02395
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company II
Defendant:
Alexis Javier Murphy-Rosado, Raymond Murphy-Rivera, Sarah Rosado-Pantoja and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
VIDRA v. MENKE et al
as 2:2014cv07277
Plaintiff:
GEORGE M. VIDRA
Defendant:
MARK MENKE, CHARLES N. BURCKHARDT, CARLOS VEGA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Murphy v Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc et al
as 6:2014cv03088
Plaintiff:
Raymond Murphy and Martha Murphy
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc , Takeda Pharmaceuticals Co Ltd , Eli Lilly & Co and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vidra v. Menke et al
as 4:2014cv01132
Plaintiff:
George M. Vidra
Defendant:
Mark Menke, Charles N. Burckhardt, Carlos Vega and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
