Cases 11 - 20 of 93
Krakauer et al v. Recreational Equipment Inc
as 3:2022cv05830
Plaintiff:
Jacob Krakauer and Joyce Rockwood
Defendant:
Recreational Equipment Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Patricia Lilja v. J&B Importers Inc, et al
as 22-2637
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICIA LILJA
Defendant / Appellee:
J&B IMPORTERS INC and RECREATIONAL EQUIPMENT INC
Defendant:
KALLOY INDUSTRIAL CO LTD
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv06731
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv02977
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Lupia v. Recreational Equipment, Inc.
as 3:2022cv02510
Plaintiff:
Lauren Lupia
Defendant:
Recreational Equipment, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
RECOG IP LLC v. Recreational Equipment, Inc.
as 6:2022cv00257
Plaintiff:
RECOG IP LLC
Defendant:
Recreational Equipment, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Bailey v. Recreational Equipment, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01211
Plaintiff:
Matthew James Bailey
Defendant:
Recreational Equipment, Inc., Eric Artz and Anthony Truesdale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Hitel Technologies LLC v. Recreational Equipment, Inc.
as 6:2022cv00206
Plaintiff:
Hitel Technologies LLC
Defendant:
Recreational Equipment, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Alvarez v. Recreational Equipment, Inc. d/b/a REI
as 8:2021cv01312
Defendant:
Recreational Equipment, Inc. d/b/a REI
Plaintiff:
Maria Alvarez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
