Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Freeman (ID 43826) v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 5:2024cv03038
Plaintiff:
Charles Leroy Freeman, III
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service, Department of Veterans Affairs, Kansas Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
REDBURN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv33255
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY REDBURN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
McCutchen v. Redburn Tire Company
as 1:2021cv01155
Plaintiff:
Gavin McCuthcen and Gavin McCutchen
Defendant:
Redburn Tire Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States of America v. Redburn
as 2:2018mc50088
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Jack Redburn, III
Redburn v. Berryhill
as 2:2017cv01215
Defendant:
Nancy A Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Tracy Rae Redburn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Keith Redburn v. Charmelle Garrett
as 17-40670
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH REDBURN
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARMELLE GARRETT, Individually and as city Manager of City of Victoria Texas, LYNN SHORT, Individually, and as Director of Public Works City of Victoria Texas and CITY OF VICTORIA
Keith Redburn v. Charmelle Garrett
as 17-40369
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH REDBURN
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF VICTORIA
REDBURN v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE
as 1:2015cv01719
Plaintiff:
MICHELE R. REDBURN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Lawrence Coleman v. Larry Crawford, et al
as 15-3056
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Lawrence Coleman
Defendant - Appellee:
Larry Crawford, Department Director, Matt Sturm, Director, Alan Earls, Division Director and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
