Cases 31 - 40 of 350
Timmeka Harris-Reese v. US
as 22-2138
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TIMMEKA HARRIS-REESE, Individually and as Parent and Next Friend of Z.R. and DOUGLAS M. REESE, JR., Individually and as Parent and Next Friend of Z.R.
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Reese v. Hodges et al
as 3:2022cv03645
Plaintiff:
John E. Reese, III
Defendant:
Daniel L. Hodges, ComSovereign Holding Corp. and Transform-X, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Negotiable Instrument
MONTGOMERY v. HUNT et al
as 1:2022cv00801
Plaintiff:
RODNEY LEE MONTGOMERY
Defendant:
SERGEANT GARY HUNT, SERGEANT REESE and MR. JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. Sullivan et al
as 5:2022ct03341
Plaintiff:
Ricky Butler
Defendant:
Warden Sullivan, Warden Ramos, Captain Fringley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ricky Butler v. Warden Sullivan
as 22-7000
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICKY BUTLER
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN SULLIVAN, WARDEN RAMOS, CAPTAIN FRINGLEY and others
Reese v. Newman
as 3:2022cv00571
Plaintiff:
Stephen W. Reese
Defendant:
Sgt. William Newman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowman et al v. Lewis et al
as 6:2022cv02160
Plaintiff:
Ariel Bowman, Carey Reese and Daryl Culbertson
Defendant:
Sheriff Hobart Lewis, Brayden L Leopold, Colin B Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
BUTLER v. SULLIVAN et al
as 1:2022cv00445
Plaintiff:
RICKY BUTLER
Defendant:
WARDEN SULLIVAN, WARDEN RAMOS, CAPTAIN FRINGLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Bivens Action
Jackson v. South Carolina Department of Corrections, The et al
as 1:2022cv01656
Plaintiff:
Randle Jackson
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, The, Captain Livingston, Anthony Howard Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
