Cases 71 - 80 of 1,322
Reese, Dontay v. Jackson County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2023cv00449
Plaintiff:
Dontay Lavarice Reese
Defendant:
Jackson County Sheriff's Office, Sheriff Duane M Waldera, Chief Deputy Adam M. Olson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Dr. Reese et al
as 2:2023cv01023
Plaintiff:
Eric Garcia
Defendant:
Dr. Reese, High Desert State Prison Medical Staff, Nurse Veta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley Monical v. Mike Winters, et al
as 23-35400
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRADLEY WILLIAM MONICAL
Defendant / Appellee:
MIKE WINTERS, Sheriff, COREY FALLS, Sheriff, PENDLAND, Lt. and others
Darren Reese v. Jay Forshey
as 23-3494
Petitioner / Appellant:
DARREN M. REESE
Respondent / Appellee:
JAY FORSHEY, Warden
KEEHN v. NEWBEARY et al
as 1:2023cv00932
Plaintiff:
Gerald Keehn
Defendant:
LT. Newbeary, Brittian, Lieutenant Reese and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reese-Green v. Richland County et al
as 8:2023cv02476
Plaintiff:
Montel Reese-Green
Defendant:
Richland County and FNU Pearson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Reese v. Calloway et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00350
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Reese
Defendant:
Rolanda Calloway, Ms. Young, Ms. Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KEEHN v. NEWBEARY et al
as 2:2023cv02078
Plaintiff:
GERALD KEEHN
Defendant:
LT. NEWBEARY, WARDEN BRITTIAN, CAPT REESE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Folley v. Merz et al
as 1:2023cv01016
Plaintiff:
Derek Folley
Defendant:
Hon. Michael R. Merz, Esq. William H. Lamb, Esq. Mary Anne Reese and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Perry Reese, III
as 23-6419
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
PERRY REESE, III
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
