Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,088
Reggie LayIn re: Reggie Lay
as 24-1381
Petitioner: In re: REGGIE LAMOUR LAY
USA v. Reggie Johnson
as 24-1747
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: REGGIE JOHNSON
Randy Quaid et al v. Craig Granet et al
as 2:2024cv03455
Plaintiff: Randy Quaid and Evgenia Quaid
Defendant: Craig Granet, Tony Davis, Reggie Serrano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Lay v. Swanson
as 5:2024cv11087
Plaintiff: Reggie Lamour Lay
Defendant: Swanson
Childress et al v. City of Cincinnati, Ohio et al
as 1:2024cv00214
Plaintiff: Akil Childress, Emma Sue Long, Charlene Berkhalter and others
Defendant: City of Cincinnati, Ohio, Jan-Michele Lemon Kearney, Victoria Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chelesy Eastep v. City of Nashville, TN, et al
as 24-5341
Plaintiff: CHELESY EASTEP, as surviving spouse and next of kin of Landon Dwayne Eastep
Defendant: CITY OF NASHVILLE, TN, REGGIE EDGE, JR., in his individual and official capacity as an officer of the Tennessee Highway Patrol and CHARLES ACHINGER, in his individual and official capacity as an officer of the Tennessee Highway Patrol
Reggie Huff v. Brookings Police Department, et al
as 24-1776
Plaintiff: Reggie D. Huff
Defendant: Brookings Police Department, Dawn M. Elshere, Nominal Defendant, David Erickson and others
Billingsley v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv04062
Plaintiff: Reggie Billingsley
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
McCoy v. USP Atwater
as 24-2241
Petitioner: REGGIE L. MCCOY
Respondent: WARDEN OF USP ATWATER
Jack et al v. Thomas et al
as 6:2024cv00461
Plaintiff: Reggis Quentin Jack and Jona Huval
Defendant: Cody Thomas, Jonathan Dungin, Jessica Laborde and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?