Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Barnett v. Dorsey Run Correctional Facility
as 1:2022cv02562
Plaintiff:
Reginald Barnett
Defendant:
Dorsey Run Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
AL-HAJ v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2015cv12805
Plaintiff:
AHMED MOHAMMED AL-HAJ
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Jeff Grondolsky, CLINICAL DIRECTOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AL-HAJ v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2015cv00070
Plaintiff:
AHMED MOHAMMED AL-HAJ
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, JEFF GRONDOLSKY, CLINICAL DIRECTOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. Barnett et al
as 1:2013cv11910
Plaintiff:
Robert Michael Hamilton
Defendant:
Reginald Barnett, John Hojnoski, Michael Borecky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malouf v. Devens F.M.C et al
as 1:2013cv10036
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Malouf
Defendant:
Devens F.M.C, Turner, Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mimms v. Hunton et al
as 1:2012cv10527
Plaintiff:
Reginald A. Mimms
Defendant:
Carrie Hunton, S. Larkin, Reginald Barnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnett et al v. Holt et al
as 1:2012cv00183
Plaintiff:
Reginald Barnett, Austin Grupee, Ronald Yarborough and others
Defendant:
Ronnie Holt, W. Dobushak, Angela Dunbar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Black v. United States et al
as 1:2011cv12128
Plaintiff:
Michael Black
Defendant:
United States of America , Sandra Howard and Reginald Barnett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Malouf v. Barnett et al
as 1:2011cv12120
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Malouf
Defendant:
Reginald Barnett , Stephen Spaulding and Jeffrey Grondolsky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnett v. Warden
as 5:2011cv00429
Plaintiff:
Reginald Barnett
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
