Cases 1 - 10 of 152
Central Maine Power Company, et al v. ME Comm'n on Gov't Ethics and Election Practices, et al
as 24-1265
Plaintiff:
VERSANT POWER, ENMAX CORPORATION, MAINE PRESS ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant:
MAINE COMMISSION ON GOVERNMENTAL ETHICS AND ELECTION PRACTICES, WILLIAM J. SCHNEIDER, in his official capacity as Chairman of the Maine Commission on Governmental Ethics and Election Practices, DAVID R. HASTINGS, III, in his official capacity as a Member of the Maine Governmental Ethics and Election Practices and others
Interested Party:
PROTECT MAINE ELECTIONS
Petitioner:
FREE SPEECH FOR PEOPLE and REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS
U.S. News & World Report, L.P. v. Chiu
as 3:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
U.S. News & World Report, L.P.
Defendant:
David Chiu and Health Care
Amicus Curiae:
Mara W. Elliott, City Attorney of San Diego and Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE et al
as 1:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
CENTRAL MAINE POWER COMPANY v. MAINE COMMISSION ON GOVERNMENTAL ETHICS AND ELECTION PRACTICES et al
as 1:2023cv00450
Plaintiff:
CENTRAL MAINE POWER COMPANY
Defendant:
MAINE COMMISSION ON GOVERNMENTAL ETHICS AND ELECTION PRACTICES, WILLIAM J SCHNEIDER, DAVID R HASTINGS, III and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
VERSANT POWER, ENMAX CORPORATION, MAINE PRESS ASSOCIATION and others
Amicus Curiae:
PROTECT MAINE ELECTIONS
Petitioner:
FREE SPEECH FOR PEOPLE and REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS et al v. ROKITA et al
as 1:2023cv01805
Plaintiff:
REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS, INDIANA BROADCASTERS ASSOCIATION, INDIANA PROFESSIONAL CHAPTER OF THE SOCIETY OF PROFESSIONAL JOURNALISTS and others
Defendant:
TODD ROKITA, RYAN MEARS and KERRY FORESTAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Jane Sullivan, et al v. University of Washington, et al
as 23-35313
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JANE SULLIVAN and P. POES, 1-75; Individually and on behalf of others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON, a Washington public corporation and ELIZA SAUNDERS, Director of Public Records and Open Public Meetings, University of Washington
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS, INC.
Amicus Curiae:
REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS, CALIFORNIANS AWARE, FIRST AMENDMENT COALITION and others
Students for Fair Admissions, Inc., et al v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
as 23-1079
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STUDENTS FOR FAIR ADMISSIONS, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE
Defendant:
BOARD OF OVERSEERS OF HARVARD COLLEGE
Interested Party:
REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS, SARAH COLE, NEW ENGLAND FIRST AMENDMENT COALITION and others
In Re:Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
as 23-1088
Petitioner:
REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS
Respondent:
STUDENTS FOR FAIR ADMISSIONS, INC., PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE, BOARD OF OVERSEERS OF HARVARD COLLEGE and others
Interested Party:
BOSTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS, AMERICAN COUNCIL ON EDUCATION, and 36 other Higher Education Organizations, MICHAEL P. KEANE and others
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
as 1:2023mc00002
Petitioner:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Respondent:
COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
Amicus Curiae:
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP, REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS, CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Reporters Comm. for Freedom of the Press v. United States
as 22-3326
Petitioner / Appellant:
Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
