Environmental Matters Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 55
United States of America et al v. Aerosols Danville, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00405
Defendant: Aerosols Danville, Inc., Clean Harbors of Braintree, Inc., Electric Boat Corporation and others
Plaintiff: United States of America and Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
State of California et al v. United States Postal Service et al
as 3:2022cv02583
Plaintiff: State of California, State of New York, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and others
Defendant: United States Postal Service and Louis DeJoy
Intervenor Defendant: Oshkosh Defense, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
United States Of America v. City of Woonsocket, Rhode Island et al
as 1:2021cv00491
Plaintiff: United States Of America
Defendant: City of Woonsocket, Rhode Island and Synagro Northeast, LLC
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
United States of America et al v. Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc.
as 1:2020cv05112
Plaintiff: The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Workforce Development, The State of Rhode Island, Department of Labor Standards and others
Defendant: Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2616 Toxic Substance control; seizure of chemical
STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al v. CHAO et al
as 1:2019cv02826
Plaintiff: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF MINNESOTA, STATE OF MARYLAND and others
Defendant: ELAINE L. CHAO, NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION, United States and others
Petitioner: NATIONAL COALITION FOR ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION, ASSOCIATION OF GLOBAL AUTOMAKERS, INC. and COALITION FOR SUSTAINABLE AUTOMOTIVE REGULATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Emhart Industries, et al v. CNA Holdings LLC, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1563
3Rd Party Defendant: ROHM & HAAS COMPANY, UNILEVER, BNS LLC and others
Defendant: NEW ENGLAND CONTAINER COMPANY INC, ROBERT M. GATES, in his Official Capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Defense, MICHAEL B. DONLEY, in his Official Capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Air Force and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: EMHART INDUSTRIES, INC. and STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, by and through the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management
Defendant / Appellee: US NAVY, US DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, UNITED STATES and others
Interested Party: DOW INC., f/k/a Dow Chemical Company, RHODES TECHNOLOGIES INC and WIN NOREN
Peterson Puritan Site OU 2 Remedial Action Group v. A and J Tool & Findings Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00497
Defendant: EEM, Inc., McDonald's Corporation, American Textile and others
Plaintiff: Peterson Puritan Site OU 2 Remedial Action Group and Peterson - Puritan Site OU 2 Remedial Action Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
State of Rhode Island, Department of Environmental Management v. Black & Decker Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00316
Plaintiff: State of Rhode Island, Department of Environmental Management
Defendant: Black & Decker Inc. and Emhart Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
STATE OF NEW YORK et al v. E. SCOTT PRUITT et al Featured Case
as 1:2018cv00773
Plaintiff: STATE OF NEW YORK , STATE OF CALIFORNIA , STATE OF CONNECTICUT and others
Defendant: E. SCOTT PRUITT and UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604
State Of New York v. Pruitt et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv01030
Plaintiff: State Of New York , State of California , State of Connecticut and others
Defendant: E. Scott Pruitt , United States Environmental Protection Agency , Ryan A. Fisher and others
Intervenor_defendant: American Farm Bureau Federation , American Forest & Paper Association , American Petroleum Institute and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?