Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00093
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Patrick Smith v. Kevin Avent
as 22-7350
Plaintiff / Appellant: PATRICK RICARDO SMITH
Defendant / Appellee: OFFICER KEVIN AVENT, OFFICER CAROLYN BRODIE and CAPTAIN JUSTIN WILLIAMS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-13774
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Smith v. Avent et al
as 5:2022ct03317
Plaintiff: Patrick Ricardo Smith
Defendant: Officer Kevin Avent, Officer Carolyn Brodie and Captain Justin Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv62139
Plaintiff: RICARDO SMITH
Defendant: 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00156
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SMITH v. CAMPUS LODGE GAINESVILLE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00168
Defendant: CAMPUS LODGE GAINESVILLE and COASTAL RIDGE REAL ESTATE
Plaintiff: BRANDON RICARDO SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Smith v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2018hc02068
Petitioner: Patrick Ricardo Smith
Respondent: State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Hooks We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00013
Petitioner: Patrick Ricardo Smith
Respondent: Erik A. Hooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SMITH v. DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv03980
Plaintiff: RICARDO SMITH
Defendant: DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO U.S. HOLDINGS, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?