Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Mitchell et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv11485
Plaintiff:
Brenda K. Mitchell and Richard J. Mitchell
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MITCHELL v. GAF CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv80086
Plaintiff:
RICHARD W. MITCHELL
Defendant:
GAF CORPORATION, THE FLINTKOTE COMPANY, ROCKWOOL MANUFACTURING COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mitchell v. Negi et al
as 1:2010cv00803
Plaintiff:
Richard A Mitchell
Defendant:
Shivani Negi, Barbara Watkins, Hollis Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton et al v. Negi et al
as 1:2010cv00664
Plaintiff:
Bertha M Hamilton, Dennis M Egelston, Lavelle T Tullis and others
Defendant:
Shivani Negi, Barbara Watkins, Hollis Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton et al v. Negi et al
as 6:2010cv00664
Plaintiff:
Bertha M Hamilton, Dennis M Egelston, Tullis T Lavelle and others
Defendant:
Shivani Negi, Barbara Watkins and Hollis Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McLemore et al v. RJ Corman Derailment Svcs, LLC et al
as 9:2008cv00161
Defendant:
RJ Corman Derailment Svcs, LLC and Richard Ashley Mitchell
Plaintiff:
Vernon McLemore and Cynthia McLemore
Cause Of Action: Diversity
McLemore et al v. RJ Corman Derailment Svcs, LLC et al
as 9:2008cv00162
Defendant:
RJ Corman Derailment Svcs, LLC and Richard Ashley Mitchell
Plaintiff:
Vernon McLemore and Cynthia McLemore
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Patel v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2008cv00500
Plaintiff:
Nirav C. Patel
Defendant:
Richard W. Mitchell and United Parcel Service Inc
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Durham v. Mitchell
as 2:2008cv04007
Plaintiff:
Lloyd J Durham
Defendant:
Richard W Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
KENDRICK et al
as 2:2007cv66141
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EDWARD KENDRICK, BONNIE KENDRICK, JAMES LEE KING and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
