Cases 1 - 10 of 68
Sarretta v. Florida Department of Corrections et. al.
as 6:2023cv01786
Plaintiff:
SMITH-SANDERS SARRETTA and Sarretta Smith-Sanders
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, John Melillo, Florida Commission on Offender Review, et. al., Florida Department of Corrections, John A. Melillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MARTIN v. WILLIAMS et al
as 5:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
WARREN K MARTIN
Defendant:
M WILLIAMS, A PARKER, A DAVINGSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yvette Beaulieu v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 21-5183
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Yvette B. Beaulieu
Defendant / Appellee:
Merrick B. Garland, Mark Gross, James R. Clapper, Jr. and others
Richard Davidson v. Norm Robinson
as 21-3638
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD A. DAVIDSON
Respondent / Appellee:
NORM ROBINSON, Warden
Richard Davidson v. Hearings Officer Franks
as 21-6651
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN CARL MANIS, Wallens Ridge State Prison, MARCUS ELAM, JOHN DOE, employed by Virginia Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD L. DAVIDSON
Wind v. United States Incorporated et al
as 1:2020cv01113
Defendant:
Kate Knowles, Matthew Newcomer, James McKenzie and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Carl Wind, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Davidson v. Wanza Jackson-Mitchell
as 19-3578
Respondent / Appellee:
WANZA JACKSON-MITCHELL, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD A. DAVIDSON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00158
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Davidson v. State of Ohio et al
as 1:2018cv00777
Defendant:
State of Ohio and Mike DeWine
Plaintiff:
Richard A Davidson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NYBERG v. DAVIDSON et al
as 4:2018cv00290
Plaintiff:
DAVID ANSGAR NYBERG
Defendant:
RICHARD D DAVIDSON and MELINDA COONROD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
