Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Favela v. Collier
as 22-40415
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Raul Gerardo Favela, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Bryan Collier, Individually, William Stephens, Individually, Brad Livingston, Individually and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01417
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ALFORD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv52501
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ALFORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Morgan v. Erica Swicegood, et al
as 19-50684
Defendant / Appellee:
L. HENSON, Nurse, Lasalle Corrections, Jack Harwell Dentention Center, T. CHUDEJ, Nurse, Lasalle Corrections, Jack Harwell Dentention Center, RONDA STONE, Assistant of Administration#killingit, Lasalle Corrections, Jack Harwell Dentention Center and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL EUGENE MORGAN
Disability Rights Texas v. Alford
as 6:2019cv00391
Plaintiff:
Disability Rights Texas
Defendant:
Richard Alford
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
Favela v. Collier et al
as 9:2019cv00093
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Richard Alford, William Stephens and others
Plaintiff:
Raul Gerardo Favela, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cobb v. Alford et al
as 6:2019cv00304
Respondent:
Warden Richard Alford, Officer FNU Lockhart, Sgt. FNU Montgomery and others
Petitioner:
Martin Darnell Cobb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Morgan v. Swicegood et al
as 1:2019cv00463
Defendant:
Richard Alford, Erica Swicegood and T Chudej
Plaintiff:
Michael Eugene Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Favela v. Collier et al
as 1:2019cv00291
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Richard Alford, William Stephens and others
Plaintiff:
Raul Gerardo Favela, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Raby v. Paul Tolly, et al
as 19-40222
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES DOUGLAS RABY
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD ALFORD, VIRGIL MCMULLEN, TERRY VALENTINE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
