Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Bell v. City of Hopkinsville, Kentucky et al
as 5:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Daron Darnell Bell
Defendant:
City of Hopkinsville, Kentucky, Richard Boling, Eric Pacheo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker et al v. Bean et al
as 5:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
D'Shayvon Baker and Kyreisha Williams
Defendant:
Officer Sean Bean, Chief Jason Newby, Richard Boling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Haskins v. Sumpter et al
as 5:2023cv00079
Plaintiff:
Tarvous Haskins
Defendant:
Clayton Sumpter, Jerimiah Kline, Hopkinsville Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ezell v. Boling et al
as 5:2020cv00073
Defendant:
Jason Pfeil, Richard Boling and Rick Sandbore
Plaintiff:
James L. Ezell, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Francis v. Boling
as 5:2020cv00007
Plaintiff:
Shane DeShawn Francis
Defendant:
Richard Boling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boling et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv19753
Plaintiff:
Donna G. Boling and Richard Boling
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. and American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boling et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv01355
Plaintiff:
Donna G. Boling and Richard Boling
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. and American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Herndon v. Chicago Police Dept et al
as 1:2012cv00017
Plaintiff:
James Herndon
Defendant:
Chicago Police Dept, Donald Clarke, Richard Boling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pappas et al v. Choi Kwang Do Martial Arts International, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv10460
Defendant:
Choi Kwang Do Martial Arts International, Inc. and Kwang Jo Choi
Plaintiff:
Andrew J. Pappas , Gary Collins , Jeff D. Bully and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
