Cases 1 - 9 of 9
David Foley, Jr., et al v. Orange County, et al
as 23-12740
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID WASH FOLEY, JR. and JENNIFER T. FOLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
ORANGE COUNTY, ASIMA M. AZAM, TIM BOLDIG and others
David Foley, Jr., et al v. Orange County, et al
as 22-13864
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID W. FOLEY, JR., JENNIFER T. FOLEY and DAVID WASH FOLEY, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
ORANGE COUNTY, ASIMA M. AZAM, TIM BOLDIG and others
Foley et al v. Orange County et al
as 6:2022cv00456
Plaintiff:
David W. Foley, Jr. and Jennifer T. Foley
Defendant:
Orange County, Asima Azam, Tim Boldig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gard v. Crotty et al
as 8:2015mc00057
Defendant:
Richard Crotty and Debra Schueth
Plaintiff:
Christopher J Gard
Interested Party:
U.S. Bankruptcy Court
Crotty v. Wall et al
as 4:2014cv40160
Plaintiff:
Richard Crotty
Defendant:
Josh Wall, Andrea Cabral and Martha Coakley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Foley, Jr., et al v. Orange County
as 14-10936
Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross Appellant:
DAVID W. FOLEY, JR. and JENNIFER T. FOLEY
Defendant - Appellant-Cross Appellee:
ORANGE COUNTY
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANK DETOMA, ASIMA M. AZAM, RODERICK LOVE and others
Crotty v. Massachusetts Parole Board, et al
as 12-1360
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD CROTTY
Defendant - Appellee:
MASSACHUSETTS PAROLE BOARD, MARK A. CONRAD, individually and in their capacity as members of the Massachusetts Parole Board, CANDACE KOCHIN, individually and in their capacity as members of the Massachusetts Parole Board and others
Foley et al v. Orange County et al
as 6:2012cv00269
Plaintiff:
David W. Foley, Jr. and Jennifer T. Foley
Defendant:
Orange County , Phil Smith, Carol Hossfield and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Crotty v. Massachusetts Parole Board et al
as 4:2010cv40245
Plaintiff:
Richard Crotty
Defendant:
Massachusetts Parole Board, Mark A. Conrad, Candace Kochin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
