Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Curtis v. Furlow et al
as 5:2021cv00161
Plaintiff:
Richard Curtis
Defendant:
Philip Mack Furlow and Reed A Filley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curtis v. Warden, Marion Correctional Institution
as 1:2021cv00479
Petitioner:
Richard Curtis
Respondent:
Warden, Marion Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jenkins v. Culpeper et al
as 1:2019cv00395
Defendant:
Unknown Zook, Unknown Culpeper and Harold Clark
Plaintiff:
Richard Curtis Jenkins, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Southern Health Partners et al
as 3:2018cv01388
Plaintiff:
Richard Curtis Rogers
Defendant:
Sumner Co. Jail and Southern Health Partners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. Sheriff Al Cannon Detention Center et al
as 5:2018cv00875
Plaintiff:
Richard Curtis Freeman, II
Defendant:
Sheriff Al Cannon Detention Center, Carolina Center for Occupational Health, A Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lighty v. USA
as 1:2016cv00487
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Richard Curtis Lighty, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Gambill v. Curtis et al
as 4:2014cv00167
Plaintiff:
Joseph V Gambill
Defendant:
Richard Curtis, Max Cook and R Lawrence Roberson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. Florence County Detention Center et al
as 5:2012cv03281
Plaintiff:
Richard Curtis Freeman, II
Defendant:
Florence County Detention Center and Jacob Speight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Curtis v. Warden Correctional Reception Center
as 1:2012cv00260
Petitioner:
Richard Curtis
Respondent:
Warden Correctional Reception Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Freeman v. Florence County Detention Center et al
as 5:2012cv00398
Plaintiff:
Richard Curtis Freeman, II
Defendant:
Florence County Detention Center, Major Norris, Captain Brunson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
