Cases 1 - 10 of 156
Johnson v. Smith
as 6:2024cv00096
Petitioner:
Richard James Johnson
Respondent:
Sheriff Larry R Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Smith
as 6:2024cv00088
Petitioner:
Richard James Johnson
Respondent:
Sheriff Larry R. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCracken v. Hyatte et al
as 3:2024cv00169
Plaintiff:
Richard McCracken and Richard James McCracken
Defendant:
William Hyatte and George Payne, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armstrong v. Greene
as 4:2023cv00941
Petitioner:
Richard James Armstrong
Respondent:
Sheriff Jerry Greene
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Flores v. Hanley et al
as 3:2023cv00305
Plaintiff:
Richard James Flores
Defendant:
Acting Superintendent James Hanley, Security Manager J. Jorgensen, Lieutenant K. Pohlschneider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bassett v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv00775
Petitioner:
Richard James Bassett, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
McIntyre v. Jardon
as 3:2022cv00234
Petitioner:
Richard James McIntyre
Respondent:
Teresa Jardon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Welk v. CA. Dept. of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv00351
Plaintiff:
Richard James Welk
Defendant:
CA. Dept. of Corrections, Robert Mayes, Mejorado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Welk v. CA Dept of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv01494
Plaintiff:
Richard James Welk
Defendant:
CA Dept of Corrections, Rosemary Ndoh, D. Crenshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Welk v. CA Dept of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv01799
Plaintiff:
Richard James Welk
Defendant:
CA Dept of Corrections, Rosemary Ndoh, D. Crenshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
