Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Kline v. Yesco, LLC
as 2:2024cv00750
Plaintiff:
Richard Kline
Defendant:
Yesco, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Clean Juice Franchising, LLC v. Charleston Juicing, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00894
Plaintiff:
Clean Juice Franchising, LLC
Defendant:
Charleston Juicing, LLC, Charleston Juicing Calhoun, LLC, Charleston Juicing West Ashley, LLC and others
Frasier v. Kline et al
as 4:2022cv11831
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Frasier
Defendant:
Richard Kline and Northeast Transport, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Judge Page Kelley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Kline et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2014cv01249
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Products Inc , DePuy International, Limited and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Kline and Sandra Kline
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-3291
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Hachmeister v. Kline et al
as 5:2012cv03263
Plaintiff:
Jason Wayne Hachmeister
Defendant:
Richard Kline, Brian Cole, Tim Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foster v. Langdon et al
as 5:2012cv03213
Plaintiff:
Modest T. Foster
Defendant:
Andrew T. Langdon, Morgan H. Bracken, Gregory M. Pert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Trober v. Kline
as 5:2012cv03074
Plaintiff:
Brian Lee Trober, Jr.
Defendant:
Richard Kline
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elnicki v. Kline et al
as 5:2011cv03049
Petitioner:
Justin D. Elnicki
Respondent:
Richard Kline and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
