Cases 1 - 10 of 28
NORRIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv32696
Plaintiff:
RICHARD NORRIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Norris v. Mississippi State Peneteniary
as 4:2021cv00111
Plaintiff:
Steven Richard Norris
Defendant:
Mississippi State Peneteniary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Norris v. Mississippi State Penitentiary
as 5:2021cv00074
Plaintiff:
Steven Richard Norris
Defendant:
Mississippi State Penitentiary
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NORRIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv05452
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD NORRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jiminez v. Martin et al
as 7:2020cv01038
Defendant:
Tony Murray, Don Martin and Richard Norris
Plaintiff:
Mario Jiminez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NORRIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv62391
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD NORRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Richard Norris v. Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv04576
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc., Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc., and Does 1 to 10
Plaintiff:
Richard Norris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Carachure-Avilez v. Norris et al
as 3:2020cv00664
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and Richard Norris
Plaintiff:
Joel Carachure-Avilez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norris v. Dillon et al
as 2:2019cv05653
Defendant:
Daniel Dillon, Swan Lake Event Center LLC and Nightingale Ventures Ltd.
Plaintiff:
Richard Norris
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Norris et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2018cv00177
Plaintiff:
Richard Norris and Jean Norris
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
