Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 25
USA v. Richard Potts
as 23-3096
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: RICHARD POTTS, a/k/a Nasir Haqq; a/k/a Nasir Jones; a/k/a Nasir; a/k/a Naz,
USA v. Richard Potts
as 22-2200
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: RICHARD POTTS, a/k/a NASIR HAQQ, a/k/a NASIR JONES, a/k/a NASIR, a/k/a NAZ
POTTS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv29652
Plaintiff: RICHARD POTTS
Defendant: AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Richard Potts
as 19-3158
Defendant / Appellant: RICHARD POTTS, also known as Nasir Haqq also known as Nasir Jones also known as Nasir also known as Naz
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Seanache Homes, Inc. et al v. Cain et al
as 3:2019cv00625
Defendant: River Edge Inn, LLC, Mike Todd, Judy Larson and others
Plaintiff: Richard Potts and Seanache Homes, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Bruno et al v. Potts et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2017cv07225
Defendant: Law Offices of C. Richard Potts, Jester Gibson & Moore, LLP, The Cavanaugh Law Firm and others
Plaintiff: Joann Bruno and Paul Leonard Bruno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In re: Richard Pott
as 17-3173
Petitioner: In re: RICHARD POTTS
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Richard Pott
as 17-3032
Plaintiff - Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Petitioner: RICHARD POTTS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. POTTS
as 2:2017cv04218
Defendant: RICHARD POTTS
Petitioner: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Dixon v. Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund et al
as 2:2016cv07393
Defendant: Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund, Richard Potts and Joseph Goodrow
Plaintiff: Darrick Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?