Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Hendrick v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv00867
Plaintiff:
Tommie Hendrick and Tommie Hendrick, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Michael Donnelly and Richard Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01493
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Glover v. Trelstad et al
as 0:2022cv01302
Plaintiff:
Wilbert Glover
Defendant:
Brad Trelstad, Brad Lindberg, Jason Bergstrom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Shorr v. The City of Rochester et al
as 6:2022cv06005
Plaintiff:
james shorr
Defendant:
City of Rochester, Matthew D. Lucero, Randy Potuck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Olivan v. City of New York et al
as 1:2021cv07183
Plaintiff:
Antonio Olivan
Defendant:
City of New York, Michael Kobus, Richard Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01013
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv06654
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00377
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calixto v. City of New York
as 18-1222
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Ines Calixto
Defendant:
John Does 1 through 5, Individually (the name John Doe being ficticious, as the true names are presently unknown)
Defendant - Appellant:
City of New York, Wilkis Cespedes, Individually, Richard Rodriguez, Individually and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01335
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
