Cases 1 - 10 of 1,147
Ellis Jr. v. Sandoval et al
as 1:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Guy Ellis Jr.
Defendant:
Angela Sandoval, John Tekin, Dea Zantow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Omar et al (PS) v. Diggins et al
as 1:2024cv01118
Plaintiff:
Ellu M. Omar, Demetrius M. Wallace, Jerren R. Pack and others
Defendant:
Diggins, Line, Bruning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McBride v. Lumpkin
as 6:2024cv00198
Petitioner:
Thomas Richie McBride
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richie v. Walmart, Inc
as 2:2024cv11016
Plaintiff:
Deborah Richie
Defendant:
WALMART INC. F/K/A WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
McBride v. Enge
as 1:2024cv00379
Petitioner:
Thomas Richie McBride
Respondent:
Warden Jamadre L. Enge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Briones v. Bean et al
as 2:2024cv00701
Plaintiff:
Richi Briones
Defendant:
Jeremy Bean, Warden and Chaplain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stout v. Richie
as 5:2024ct03090
Plaintiff:
James Stout
Defendant:
Sgt. Richie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malcolm Neely v. Elmore County, et al
as 24-11112
Plaintiff:
MALCOLM NEELY
Defendant:
ELMORE COUNTY, ELMORE COUNTY COMMISSION, HENRY HINES, individually and in his Official Capacity as a member of the Elmore County Commission and others
Michael Titus v. Scarface, et al
as 24-1725
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus, ADC #168523
Defendant:
Scarface, Movie, Al Pacino, Director of Scarface, Keef Coff Group and others
WINMAR CONSTRUCTION, INC. v. IRON KINGDOM, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00968
Plaintiff:
WINMAR CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Defendant:
IRON KINGDOM, INC. and ANGELA MARIE RICHIE
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
