Cases 61 - 70 of 489
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv02442
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Kewon English v. Joseph Clarke
as 22-1788
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEWON ENGLISH
Plaintiff:
EARL POWELL
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH CLARKE, LEON LOTT, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Richland County and RICHLAND COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Caldwell v. Richland Bank et al
as 1:2022cv01286
Defendant:
Richland Bank, Park National Bank, Richland County - METRICH Enforcement Unit and others
Plaintiff:
Calvin C. Caldwell, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Johnson v. Richland County Jail
as 22-1572
Petitioner:
Robert W. Johnson
Respondent:
Richland County Jail, Christopher Blunk, James Myers and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv02119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Scott v. Richland County
as 8:2022cv02031
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Gene Scott
Defendant:
Richland County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01847
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01779
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Johnson v. Richland County Jail et al
as 1:2022cv00910
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Richland County Jail, Christopher Blunk, James Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drayton v. Richland, County of
as 3:2022cv01545
Plaintiff:
Marcus Drayton
Defendant:
Richland, County of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
