Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Marcus v. Underhill et al
as 5:2023cv01962
Plaintiff:
Luther B Marcus and Luther Brian Marcus
Defendant:
Capt Todd Underhill and Sheriff Rick Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Knight v. Clark et al
as 8:2022cv04511
Plaintiff:
Gary Rowland Knight and Gary Knight
Defendant:
Rick Clark and Drew Cisco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Vasquez v. Pickens County et al
as 8:2022cv02641
Plaintiff:
Karla M Vasquez
Defendant:
Pickens County, Pickens County Sheriff's Department, Rick Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scruggs v. Pickens County Sheriff's Office, The et al
as 8:2019cv01657
Defendant:
Corporal Brandon Faris, Pickens County Sheriff's Office, The, DFC Billy Trotter and others
Plaintiff:
Gina Scruggs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowers v. Nix
as 1:2019cv01516
Defendant:
CPT Marvin Nix, Captain Marvin Nix and Rick Clark
Plaintiff:
Brian Dale Bowers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Harris v. Nix et al
as 1:2019cv01483
Defendant:
Captain Marvin Nix and Sheriff Rick Clark
Plaintiff:
Kevin Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. St. Paul Travelers Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01454
Defendant:
Lyons Exit Realty Inc., Counselor Kessel, Nurse Blackmon and others
Plaintiff:
Edmond Hudmond Smith, IV and Louis Holger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH et al v. SAINT PAUL TRAVELERS COMPANY INC. et al
as 1:2019cv00598
Defendant:
BOB STELLER, MOBILE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT INC., EDDIE CURRAN and others
Plaintiff:
EDMOND HUDMOND SMITH, IV and LOUIS HOLGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith et al v. Saint Paul Travelers Company Inc.
as 1:2019cv00051
Defendant:
Lyons Exit Realty Inc., Counselor Kessel, Nurse Blackmon and others
Plaintiff:
Edmond Hudmond Smith, IV and Louis Holger
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
