Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Chase v. SRP Federal Credit Union
as 1:2025cv00312
Plaintiff:
Ricky Chase
Defendant:
SRP Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Richard Jordan, et al v. GA Dept of Corrections
as 17-12948
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD JORDAN and RICKY CHASE
Movant - Appellee:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
In Re: Virginia Department of Corrections
as 3:2017mc00002
Petitioner:
Virginia Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Richard Jordan and Ricky Chase
Intervenor:
Thomas Edwin Loden, Jr.
Defendant:
Marshall L. Fisher , Earnest Lee , Mississippi State Executioner and others
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Roger Thorson and Robert Simon
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Jordan et al v. Fisher
as 1:2016cv02582
Plaintiff:
Richard Jordan and Ricky Chase
Defendant:
Marshall L. Fisher
Movant:
Georgia Department of Corrections
Jordan et al v. Fisher
as 1:2016mi00040
Plaintiff:
Richard Jordan and Ricky Chase
Defendant:
Marshall L. Fisher
Movant:
Georgia Department of Corrections
Missouri Department of Corrections v. Jordan et al
as 2:2016mc09005
Movant:
Missouri Department of Corrections
Respondent:
Richard Jordan and Ricky Chase
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Richard Jordan, et al v. Marshall Fisher, et al
as 15-60604
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RICHARD JORDAN and RICKY CHASE
Defendant - Appellant:
COMMISSIONER MARSHALL L. FISHER, Commissioner, Mississippi Department of Corrections, in his Official Capacity, SUPERINTENDENT EARNEST LEE, Superintendent, Mississippi State Penitentiary, in his Official Capacity, MISSISSIPPI STATE EXECUTIONER, In his Official Capacity and others
Jordan et al v. Fisher et al
as 3:2015cv00295
Plaintiff:
Richard Jordan and Ricky Chase
Defendant:
Marshall L. Fisher , Earnest Lee , The Mississippi State Executioner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
