Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00460
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Akins v. Morehouse Parish et al
as 3:2022cv00468
Plaintiff:
Glen Akins
Defendant:
4th District Law Enforcement Morehouse Parish, Police Dept City of Bastrop, Louisiana State Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seavon Pierce v. President Barack Obama, et al
as 16-56194
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SEAVON PIERCE
Defendant - Appellee:
PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA, BENJAMIN B. WAGNER, Attorney General, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General, Attorney General and others
JOHNSON et al v. LANDIS
as 2:2014cv02363
Plaintiff:
TAMIKA JOHNSON and RICKI PERRY
Defendant:
SARAH LANDIS
Cross_claimant:
SARAH LANDIS
Cross_defendant:
TAMIKA JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sumrall et al v. East St. Louis et al
as 3:2011cv00796
Plaintiff:
Horatio Sumrall , Tommy Lee Watson and Joe Mollet, Jr
Defendant:
City of East St. Louis , Tom Dancy and Ricky Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Albert Richardson, Jr. v. Ronald Matthews, et al
as 09-3622
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALBERT L. RICHARDSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD MATTHEWS, Chief of Police, East St. Louis Police Department, RICKY PERRY, AYOUB QATTOUM, Auxiliary East St. Louis Police Officer also known as DAVE QATTOUM and others
West v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2008cv00382
Plaintiff:
Marquis B. West
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Anne B. Moore, Rhonda Billings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
West v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2008cv00383
Plaintiff:
Marquis B. West
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Anne B. Moore, Rhonda Billings and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
