Cases 11 - 20 of 155
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00198
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lowe v. Higgins et al
as 4:2023cv00656
Plaintiff:
Joshua Spencer Lowe
Defendant:
Eric Higgins, Rimmers and T Thomson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rimmer v. Allen et al
as 5:2023cv06069
Plaintiff:
David Rimmer
Defendant:
Mitch Allen, Mike Horn, Rich Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOORE v. MILLER et al
as 3:2023cv10059
Plaintiff:
KEVIN ANTHONY MOORE
Defendant:
JOHN L MILLER and DAVID HAROLD RIMMER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rimmer v. Allen et al
as 4:2023cv00301
Plaintiff:
David Rimmer
Defendant:
Mitch Allen, Mike Horn, Rich Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rimmer v. Allen et al
as 5:2023cv06053
Plaintiff:
David Rimmer
Defendant:
Mitch Allen, Mike Horn, Rich Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Robertson v. Orlando Newburn, et al
as 23-1613
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Otis Robertson
Defendant / Appellee:
Orlando Newburn, Lieutenant, Pulaski County Detention Facility, Joseph Austin, Sergeant, Pulaski County Detention Facility, Dedrick Rimmer, Deputy, Pulaski County Detention Facility and others
RIMMER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv06056
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA RIMMER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Henson v. Allen et al
as 4:2023cv00137
Plaintiff:
Dywane Henson
Defendant:
Allen, Rimmer, Boguard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malik Rimmer v. Nathan Sanchez, et al
as 22-3364
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Malik Rimmer
Defendant / Appellee:
Nathan Sanchez, Police Officer, Justus Knudsen, Police Officer and Sioux City Police Department
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
