Cases 1 - 10 of 178
Gonzalez v. Jay Management Company LLC et al
as 4:2024cv01094
Plaintiff:
Miriam Gonzalez
Defendant:
Jay Management Company LLC, Liberty County TX, Robert Hilton Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adams v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv02029
Plaintiff:
Robert Christopher Adams and Miles
Defendant:
John Doe, Tom Dart and City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv01420
Plaintiff:
Robert Christopher Adams and Miles
Defendant:
Tom Dart, C.O. Guzman and Sgt. Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv01124
Plaintiff:
Robert Christopher Adams and Miles
Defendant:
City of Chicago, John Doe, Director to get names of Doctor's and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Robert Adams
as 24-5066
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERT THURMAN ADAMS
Robert Adams v. Zach Cook
as 23-3238
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT CHRISTOPHER ADAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
ZACH COOK, Sgt.
Strickland v. Adams
as 1:2023cv05037
Plaintiff:
Carmen Strickland
Defendant:
Robert J. Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Adams v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2023pq01895
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Adams
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Does 1 through 60 inclusive
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ADAMS v. BUCKS COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2023cv02142
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. ADAMS, JR.
Defendant:
BUCKS COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, SUPERINTENDENT METELLUS, KELLY REED and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Johnny Gregory
as 23-11379
Petitioner:
In re: JOHNNY BRETT GREGORY
Respondent:
ROBERT B. ADAMS, PAT GIDDENE, AMBER WINKLER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
