Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Sharp v. The Bowling Green Kentucky Police Department et al
as 1:2023cv00174
Plaintiff:
Robert Andrew Sharp, Jr.
Defendant:
The Bowling Green Kentucky Police Department, Stephen Irwin and Joshua Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Robbin Nelson, et al v. Heather Greene Sharp, et al
as 22-6018
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBBIN NELSON, ROBERT A. SHARP, JR. and JERRY WELLS
Defendant / Appellee:
HEATHER ANNE GREENE SHARP, CATHERINE RICE HOLDERFIELD, In her individual capacity as a Judge of the Warren Circuit Court and KY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURTS
Nelson v. Sharp
as 3:2022cv00424
Plaintiff:
Robbin Nelson
Defendant:
Heather Sharp
Interested Party:
Robert A. Sharp, Jr., Jerry Wells, Minor Child 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Other Fraud
SHARPE v. SINGLETON
as 7:2015cv00008
Petitioner:
ROBERT ARNOLD SHARPE, JR
Respondent:
ARTIS SINGLETON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
SHARPE v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 7:2013cv00011
Petitioner:
ROBERT ARNOLD SHARPE, JR
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Gorman et al v. Sharpe et al
as 3:2012cv01863
Plaintiff:
Aida Gorman and Max Gorman
Defendant:
Robert O. Sharpe, Jr. and Sharpey Enterprises
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
SHARPE v. Jackson State Prison
as 7:2012cv00030
Petitioner:
ROBERT ARNOLD SHARPE, JR
Respondent:
CARL HUMPHREY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robert Sharpe, Jr. v. Stephen Butler, et al
as 12-10568
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT ARNOLD SHARPE, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
STEPHEN BUTLER, WAYNE LUKE, ANTHONY HEATH and others
Sharpe et al v. Butler et al
as 7:2012cv00006
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ARNOLD SHARPE, JR
Defendant:
Stephen Butler, Wayne Luke, Anthony Heath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
