Cases 51 - 60 of 66
Anello v. City of Niagara Falls et al
as 1:2009cv00715
Plaintiff:
Matteo Anello
Defendant:
City of Niagara Falls, Franco Tallarico, Robert Anderson, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-5234
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Todd Lowe, et al v. Washoe County, et al
as 09-15759
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TODD LOWE, JANET LOWE, TOM HENDERSON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
WASHOE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Nevada, JOSH WILSON, Washoe County Assessor and BILL BERRUM, Washoe County Treasurer
Robert Anderson v. County of Alameda, et al
as 09-15739
Plaintiff:
DANIEL SCHAFFER, on behalf of himself and all those similarly situated
Claimant - Appellant:
ROBERT ANDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, CHARLES C. PLUMMER, Alameda County Sheriff in his individual and official capacities and ALAMEDA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPUTIES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Anderson v. Key Bank of Oregon
as 3:2009cv00115
Plaintiff:
Robert Anderson
Defendant:
Key Bank of Oregon
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Anderson v. City of Chicago Police Department
as 1:2008cv04744
Plaintiff:
Robert Anderson
Defendant:
City of Chicago Police Department
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Davalos v. City of Racine et al
as 2:2008cv00712
Plaintiff:
Cerafin Davalos
Defendant:
City of Racine, Jeff Coe, Robert Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Anderson v. V.A. Hospital
as 3:2008cv00869
Plaintiff:
Robert Anderson
Defendant:
V.A. Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv01286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
