Cases 31 - 40 of 126
Campbell v. Rutherford County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2017cv00797
Plaintiff:
Desmond Jabari Campbell
Defendant:
Rutherford County, Tennessee, Shane McFarland, R.C.A.D.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv02435
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
TAUFIELD et al v. COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION et al
as 2:2016cv08321
Defendant:
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION , COSTCO WHOLESALE STORE #1177 , COSTCO WHOLESALE STORE #231 and others
Plaintiff:
JACQUELINE TAUFIELD and ROBERT ARNOLD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Akhtar et al v. Johnson et al
as 1:2016cv00456
Plaintiff:
Jeff J Akhtar , Akhtar Housing Group LLC and Gurinda Akhtar
Defendant:
Glenn Johnson, Chris McMahon, Adam Anders and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Singer v. Price et al
as 3:2016cv02621
Plaintiff:
Leonard Singer
Defendant:
Aaron Price, Palmer Gibbs, Ed Gorham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duke v. Rutherford County et al
as 3:2016cv02480
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Duke
Defendant:
Rutherford County, Rutherford County Sheriff Dept., Robert Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. Rutherford County et al
as 3:2016cv02262
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Deauntai Pierce
Defendant:
Rutherford County, Robert Arnold, Medical Provider of Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARNOLD et al v. IRISH BRED PUB CONCEPTS CO.
as 5:2016cv04382
Plaintiff:
KAREN ARNOLD and ROBERT ARNOLD
Defendant:
IRISH BRED PUB CONCEPTS CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Johnson v. Tollinson, et al
as 3:2016cv01943
Plaintiff:
James C. Johnson
Defendant:
(f/n/u) Tollinson, (f/n/u) Rudd and Robert Arnold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kilpatrick v. O'Rourke et al
as 3:2016cv01840
Plaintiff:
Michael Kilpatrick
Defendant:
James O'Rourke, (f/n/u) Rudd, Robert Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
