Cases 41 - 50 of 70
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2011cv00127
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
SLOAN v. NAUTILUS et al
as 3:2011cv00203
Plaintiff:
JOE JW SLOAN, JR
Defendant:
NAUTILUS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION INC , MR ROOTER OF NW FLORIDA , ROBERT CARLSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robert Carlson v. Scott Fewins, et al
as 11-1062
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROBERT CARLSON, Personal Representative of the Estate of Craig Carlson
Defendant:
SCOTT FEWINS
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES JETTER, individually and officially
Mckinney v. Carlson et al
as 2:2010cv00944
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Mckinney
Defendant:
Robert Carlson , Alfred George, Wisconsin Mutual Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riker v. Carlson et al
as 2:2010cv00906
Plaintiff:
Sean A Riker
Defendant:
Robert Carlson, Douglas Wearing, John Hanrahan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Bates v. Friedell et al
as 2:2010cv00576
Plaintiff:
Craig Thomas Bates
Defendant:
Hanns Friedell, Robert Carlson, Health Professionals Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Love v. Grist et al
as 3:2010cv00143
Plaintiff:
Chester Love
Defendant:
Lana Grist, Keith Thayer, Robert Carlson and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0554
Carlson et al v. Gainey Transportation Service Inc.
as 1:2010cv00516
Plaintiff:
Marguerite Carlson and Robert Carlson
Defendant:
Gainey Transportation Service Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Georgia-Pacific Corporation v. Bush et al
as 6:2010cv06105
Defendant:
Jeannie K. Bush and Robert Carlson
Plaintiff:
Georgia-Pacific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
GREENFIELD v. CORZINE et al
as 2:2009cv04983
Plaintiff:
GILBERT THOMAS GREENFIELD, JR.
Defendant:
JON CORZINE, ANN MILGRAM, GEORGE HAYMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
